<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[世间已无理想乡 — 我给儿子换了1G的新电脑，为什么他不能玩游戏？]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://bbs.hyqinglan.net/feed/atom/topic/374/" />
	<updated>2023-04-10T16:20:43Z</updated>
	<generator version="1.4.6">PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://bbs.hyqinglan.net/topic/374/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[我给儿子换了1G的新电脑，为什么他不能玩游戏？]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://bbs.hyqinglan.net/post/1951/#p1951" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Roch Baczkowski <a href="https://www.quora.com/profile/Roch-Baczkowski-1">https://www.quora.com/profile/Roch-Baczkowski-1</a></p><p>I replaced my son&#039;s PC with an extremely good PC with 1 go of RAM, an Intel Pentium G3240 and a Quadro 600. Why can&#039;t he play his games on it?<br />我给我儿子换了1G的更好的电脑，有着Intel Pentium G3240的处理器和Quadro 600显卡。为什么他还是不能玩游戏。</p><p>I wrote a huge draft for this question but quora decided to delete it when I took a break, so I&#039;ll quickly describe why this is actually a terrible setup:<br />关于这个问题，我本来写了很大一段回答，但是不小心被quora删除了，所以我准备快速地解释下为什么会出现这种糟糕的情况：</p><p>1 gigabyte of RAM probably is the bare minimum to run basic applications like Google. A &quot;good&quot; amount of RAM for gaming is 32 gigabytes, or 16 for low demand games.<br />对于运行像谷歌这样的应用程序，1G可能是现在最低的运行内存要求。但是想要玩游戏需要32G的运行内存，或者低端一点的游戏也需要16G。（强啊，16G都不配玩游戏了）</p><p>An Intel Pentium for gaming is like digging a trench to survive a nuclear bomb. Pentium could have been great for older games, or Java-based games, since they run on only one CPU core. The bare minimum would be a Ryzen 5.<br />用英特尔奔腾处理器玩游戏，就像挖战壕以躲避核弹一样艰难。（什么神奇比喻，还好阿胖有bing）。奔腾对于老游戏还是可以的，或者对于Java游戏，因为它们只需要用到一个处理器核心，最低配置应该是Ryzen 5。</p><p>The Quadro 600 is a graphics card from more than a decade ago (firstly), and was meant for professional 3D art projects (secondly), and wasn&#039;t built for games as 3D programs have a different way to render objects compared to games (lastly).<br />首先，Quadro 600是一款十年前的绘图向显卡，第二，它更偏向于专业的3D美术制图，第三，它并不适用于打游戏，因为于游戏相比，3D制图程序以一种截然不同的方式运行。</p><p>All in all, the computer build would be great for extremely old games and office work, and perhaps some 3D modelling. But other than that, it is nowhere near being a “gaming PC”.<br />最后，你的这台电脑对于老游戏和办公是很不错的，做一些3D建模也可以。但是除此以外，它并不能说是现在的游戏电脑。</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pang]]></name>
				<uri>https://bbs.hyqinglan.net/user/675/</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-04-10T16:20:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://bbs.hyqinglan.net/post/1951/#p1951</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
